Carbon is bad and 5G is good?
Advocates of the MMGW (Man Made Global Warming) hypothesis say “the science is settled,” in complete disregard of the fact that no predictions based on the hypothesis have ever occurred, there are thousands of studies that disprove it, and thousands of scientists that disagree with it. Scientists who did research that disagreed with the hypothesis were fighting against the United Nations, government funded climate research organizations, and countless well-funded “environmental” organizations all over the world. Those scientists were ignored, discredited, and labeled "climate crisis deniers."
Companies rolling out 5G see no reason to do any scientific safety studies, citing the “settled science” of the 3 decade old FCC guidelines based on 30 minute thermal heating exposure. This is in complete disregard of the thousands of studies, for many decades, that have demonstrated serious negative biological effects from electromagnetic radiation orders of magnitude lower than those guidelines. Scientists that warn of the dangers of electromagnetic radiation are fighting against the US Military, the FCC, the telecommunications industry, cell phone manufacturers, electric utility companies, and appliance manufacturers. So of course those scientists were ignored or discredited.
Most people are unaware of all the information that is contrary to the position of the 5G advocates because the “main-stream” media suppresses it. This website presents substantial information that demonstrates electromagnetic radiation used for communication and electricity is harmful, and that the 5G system will be much worse.
​
Most people are also unaware of all the information that is contrary to the position of the MMGW advocates because the “main-stream” media suppresses it. How it all started, and examples of all the corruption and failed predictions are presented below.
Edwin Berry earned a PhD in Physics, with a focus on atmospheric physics and a minor in math. His thesis is recognized as a breakthrough in atmospheric science and in the use of computer-based numerical models. It is summarized in cloud physics textbooks and taught in university courses. He provides an excellent first-hand observation of how the MMGW scare was kick-started in the United States:
“In 1988, the Environmental Protection Agency called a meeting of atmospheric scientists and others with environmental interests. I remember well the meeting I attended in the San Francisco Bay Area. The meeting was in a theater-like lecture room with the seating curved to face the center stage and rising rapidly toward the back of the room. Attending were many atmospheric scientists whom I knew from Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Stanford Research Institute and some local colleges.
The room became silent when a man walked up to the lectern. He told us that the next big national problem was global warming. He explained how human carbon dioxide emissions were trapping the earth's radiation like a greenhouse and causing the atmosphere to heat beyond its normal temperature. He said this will lead to environmental disasters. He finished by saying the EPA will now concentrate its research funding toward quantifying the disasters that would be caused by our carbon dioxide.
The room was silent. I was the first to raise my hand to ask a question, “How can you defend your global warming hypothesis when you have omitted the effects of clouds which affect heat balance far more than carbon dioxide, and when your hypothesis contradicts the paper by Lee in the Journal of Applied Meteorology in 1972 that shows the atmosphere does not behave like a greenhouse?”
He answered me by saying, “You do not know what you are talking about. I know more about how the atmosphere works than you do.” Not being one to drop out of a fight, I responded, “I know many of the atmospheric scientists in this room, and many others who are not present but I do not know you. What is your background and what makes you know so much more than me?"
He answered, “I know more than you because I am a lawyer and I work for the EPA."
Sending out EPA lawyers to announce to atmospheric and environmental scientists that the next big problem was global warming from man-made CO2, is not the way a valid scientific investigation begins! First a question is defined. Then a hypothesis is formed. Tests are then performed and the data is analyzed to reach a conclusion. The results are reported for peer review. If other scientists are able to repeat and verify the hypothesis, a theory is born, waiting to be substantiated by future observed results that match the theory's predictions. The EPA skipped all of those steps and presented an idea as proven fact. And they made it clear that they would concentrate research funding toward quantifying the future disasters that would be caused by carbon dioxide produced by capitalism. From 1989 to 2009 the US government pumped $79 billion into the cause.
​
From 1989, if you wanted a government grant to study climate, it had to try to document how much global warming man-made CO2 was going to cause. The UN formed an International Panel to promote the idea. Scientists with a hypothesis that some other factor had a much greater influence on climate would not get any grant money. Their work would be attacked by the UN, and government grant driven MMGW advocates. Those "scientists" on government grants also conspired to keep dissenting work from being peer-reviewed or published for many years, as revealed by the climate-gate emails. (See link below)
The "97% of Scientists Agree" Fraud
One of the most often repeated claims that is designed to support MMGW is that “97% of scientists agree” that man-made CO2 is the main cause of global warming. But what is the real origin of that claim?
The 97% number has been produced several times in “studies” since 2009, all with fundamental flaws. The study most often referred to was done by John Cook in 2013. He had a MMGW activist site called Skeptical Science. His team looked at 12,271 abstracts written between 1991 and 2011 that contained the words Global Warming or Global Climate Change. From those abstracts Cook ignored 66% that he determined “took no position” on climate change. (Even with “global warming” or “global climate change” in their abstract? )
Of the remaining 1/3 or 4,010, he concluded that 97% of them endorsed the claims that the Earth was warming and human activity was causing some of it. Over time that mild set of claims became “more than 50% of global warming since the mid-20th century has been caused by human activity.” And “human activity” is meant to imply the creation of extra CO2 by capitalism.
​
David Legates, a University of Delaware professor who formerly headed the university’s Center for Climatic Research, decided to recreate Cook’s study. In his analysis of the same information, he found that only 41 of the 4,010 abstracts that Cook used explicitly endorsed the final premise. In other words, an objective scientist using the same information found that 41/4,010, or 1% of scientists, not 97% supported the claim that human activity had caused most of the global warming since the mid 20th century.
​
Other scientists dug further into the data and procedures, using Cook's original strategy of making 7 categories, and found that only 67 of the 12,271 papers in the study met the most strict category of agreement.
​
The real result of two honest, scientifically implemented reviews of Cook's original data was that 1% or less of scientists surveyed agreed that most global warming since the 20th Century was caused by human activity. Cook's baseless claim had been completely invalidated. In the world of real scientific investigation, his paper would be withdrawn and replaced by the real results. But the "Man Made Global Warming" scare is driven by politics, not real science. So the UN, ignorant and/or corrupt politicians, and of course the controlled news media continue to ignore the truth and maintain the "97% of Scientists Agree" fraud!
The Hockey Stick Fraud
The other most famous claim used to prop up belief in MMGW is in the form of a graph produced by Michael Mann at Penn State in 1999. It came to be known as the hockey stick graph, and was fabricated to show stable global temperatures for 1000 years until the industrial age began around 1900, when the graph showed a sudden exponential increase in temperature with rising CO2.
One of the fraudulent purposes of this graph was the erasure of the medieval warm period, when for hundreds of years the earth was much hotter than it is now. There have even been emails found between the dishonest associates talking about the need to somehow get rid of the medieval warm period data. This information and much more was revealed in 2009 with the release of thousands of emails, to coincide with the 2009 IPCC updated report on Climate Change. The deliberately under-reported scandal became known as "Climategate."
​
The leaked Emails exposed leading climate alarmists engaging in fraud, manipulation of data, deception, coercion of publications, various unlawful activities including destruction of data to avoid complying with freedom of information requests, and more. Obviously it was to keep “the cause” alive. Everyone had to believe that human CO2 emissions were leading to dangerous warming and that an authority like the UN was needed to enforce new totalitarian global rules to save the world.
​
This link opens a great site that has been continually updated for many years. It summarizes all of the fraud and corruption of the climate "scientists" involved since 2009, with original sources cited. CLIMATEGATE
Mann refused for many years to show any “outside” scientist his data or methods. This is of course in direct defiance of accepted scientific method, where others are expected to be able to reproduce your work as verification.
But the graph was given world-wide exposure anyway with the release of the 2001 IPCC (UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report on Global Warming. The graph was then used in hundreds of peer reviewed papers on MMGW. And it has been used by media and leftist politicians to provoke mass hysteria over the impending end of the world in 10 years or less, for over 20 years! ??
Eventually someone got a copy of the software algorithm Mann used to process his “data” and it was determined that with any random set of numbers, the result looked like a hockey stick 9 out of 10 times! Of course, that information was also suppressed by the "main stream" media.
Over the years Mann has sued people that printed information that elicited doubt about the accuracy of his graph. He sued Canadian climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball in 2011. In August of 2019 the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada dismissed Mann’s lawsuit against Ball and awarded Ball repayment of full legal costs.
Mann had refused the court’s order to turn over his original data for examination – the most important evidence for the entire trial. Under Canada’s unique ‘Truth Defense’, Mann is now proven to have willfully hidden information vital to the trial, so the court may rule he hid it because it is fake. Now the whole world would know it, except one more time, the “main stream” media ignored this information. One article about this story is HERE:
31,487 Scientists Do Agree!
Most people have never heard of the Global Warming Petition Project. The media has ignored it most of the time, except for stories attempting to discredit it. The project was started after the 1997 Kyoto Global Warming Agreement was written, as a protest against its terms. The website is still up. (You might get a "dangerous site" warning, but up until now, this has been only a method to discourage honest investigation.) Just have typical internet security software active.
The announcement:
“We urge the United States to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.”
​
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
And that last sentence has been proven to be true. There has been significant greening of the entire earth as a result of the higher CO2 levels, according to satellite data from NASA and NOAA. More leaves and grass consume more CO2 and produce additional Oxygen. Estimates also predict $9.8 trillion in added value of crops by 2050. See the story HERE.
By 2009 this petition was signed by 31,487 scientists in the United States, including 9,029 with PhD's. Many more details are still available at the website - www.petitionproject.org
The history provided here, and the examples of climate research fraud, and the petition with tens of thousands of signatures of scientists who completely disagree with the claim of MMGW, should be enough to convince everyone that they have been deceived by a political hoax. But there is much more. There has never been any real-world event to confirm the MMGW hypothesis predictions; only twisted mis-reporting to make you believe the opposite.
The Temperature Dropped
In the hot year of 1988 a "climate scientist" named Hansen produced a graph showing that the MMGW hypothesis predicted a 0.7C rise in temperature by 2008 due to rising CO2 levels. Instead the temperature dropped by 0.3C during that time with rising CO2 levels. That one result disproves the MMGW hypothesis, and confirms that CO2 level is not a primary driver of global temperature.
No Hot Spot
The process of global warming claimed by MMGW activists is by the warming of the atmosphere through the action of greenhouse gases, most notably man-made CO2. Their own mathematics and computer modeling predict the hottest temperatures would therefore be about 11,000 meters up near the equator. That would look like the colorful graph at the right where the x axis is latitude, the y axis is elevation and red is the hottest region.
Atmospheric temperature is studied in detail by weather balloons and now also by satellites. Actual data collected has been plotted in a similar graph. It looks nothing like the temperature profile predicted by MMGW activist computer models. The 11,000-meter elevation near the equator shows no warming caused by greenhouse gas at all. Again, this one example disproves the MMGW hypothesis. And of course this was also banned by the "main stream" media. Minds can be controlled not just by disinformation, but by censorship of correct information.
Manipulating the Temperature Data
Based on satellite data, the most accurate method of recording temperature, 1998 had both a large rapid temperature increase and an immediate equal decrease. Since then, there have been many annual fluctuations in temperature, but on a time averaged basis, the trend from 1997 to 2015 there was no warming trend. Since the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has continued to go up rapidly, this result disproves the MMGW hypothesis one more time. Obviously global temperature is affected by drivers with much more significance than CO2.
The MMGW activists at NOAA and others living on government grants had to do something to change that reality. So they thought they could "augment" the Global Warming hypothesis with a new disaster; the oceans were soaking up the extra heat instead of the atmosphere. In 2013 the Obama administration pressured the IPCC to use that excuse in their upcoming assessment. That of course would be a new hypothesis to be tested, while falsifying the original hypothesis yet again. This behind the scene corruption to manipulate climate data was caught once again, in what some people called Climatgate II. You probably never saw anything about it in the corrupt news that most people still watch. A good site about that is HERE
With no options left, they initiated even larger falsifications of the temperature record. They systematically engaged in what they called “homogenization.”
They lowered the “official” older temperature records all over the world, and in many cases turned a cooling trend into a warming trend. Fortunately, they could not erase all the copies of the original records, so comparisons could be made. Above is an example of one of the countless fraudulent data changes.
​
They are now manipulating the actual data in real time, adjusting it up to keep the “warmest year in history” lie alive. By 2019 they had introduced a false 2.5 degree rise in temperatures since 1895. See the article here
This video on this page provides an excellent explanation of one method used to manufacture the false temperature record.
Another scientists not afraid to speak the truth
Dr. Nakamura has a Doctorate in Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. For nearly 25 years he specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC and Duke University.
He published a book, in Japanese, in which he states that global warming data is untrustworthy and falsified. Nakamura’s book demolishes “the lie of critical global warming due to increasing carbon dioxide”, exposes the great uncertainty of “global warming in the past 100 years” and points out the glaring failure of climate models. You can see the website here
Failed Predictions
In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a world map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.
The 2005 UNEP predictions, based on the MMGW hypothesis, claimed that by 2010, 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. What were the actual results? The areas targeted by the UN failed to produce a single “climate refugee.” In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth. The UN took the map down, but soon produced a similar one predicting more horrible catastrophes further into the future.
At this point any rational human being, even those previously fooled into believing that the small amount of extra CO2 produced by capitalism was going to destroy the world, should be able to admit that they have been deceived. But how, and why, does such a massive fraudulent operation come about? What is the common origin of the two lies - that CO2 is bad and that the 5G system is wonderful?
​
One place to start is with Thomas Robert Malthus. He became famous for predicting in 1798 that increasing living standards could not be sustained with population growth. He said the exploding population would soon outstrip food production and cause disaster. That fear has been kept alive for over 200 years now, even though it has never occurred, except where tyrants deliberately starved their populations. Throughout those centuries the world also saw tyrants attempting to control all people on the planet. So those are the real reasons for these two lies; population reduction and control of all humanity.
​
Another important date is 1968. That is when the Club of Rome was founded at David Rockefeller's estate in Bellagio, Italy. In 1972 they published The Limits To Growth. It was a modern redo of the predictions of Malthus, claiming that population increase must be stopped by 1975 and industrial capital growth stopped by 1985, to create a sustainable future.
To limit population growth they said "Either the birth rate must be brought down to equal the new, lower death rate, or the death rate must rise again.” They also made this statement: "Our only hope is to transform humanity into a global interdependent sustainable society."
In 1990 they published the book The First Global Revolution. Here are some quotes:
"It would seem that humans need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose."
​
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
​
"Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.”
So there are the openly stated the goals of population reduction and control of all humanity. The "CO2 is bad" lie increases human suffering and limits population growth by choking off industrial production and destroying the lifestyle benefits of an uncorrupted free-market financial system. It also introduces the idea of the necessary control of behavior to "save the planet." Capitalism and Democracy would be replaced by a Global technology based dictatorship, or a Technocracy. And the technology to be used for control has evolved to the next level with the 5G communication system, the smart grid and smart cities.
5G allows for the efficient deployment of control mechanisms. The Social Credit System is already well established in China. It is used to control the behavior of the masses by limiting or allowing access to everything from transportation to food, based on your social credit score. Of course this requires total monitoring of everything you do, which can be implemented with 5G, facial recognition, and the new "smart" world!
There are many who are warning that the full deployment of the 5G system will also produce an explosion in illness and death from the dramatically increased high frequency radiation exposure. Thus both the "CO2 is bad" lie and the "5G is good" lie appear to accomplish the same two objectives of population reduction and total control of humanity.
​
Use your own research to continue gaining knowledge in these areas.
​